1. 首页
  2. 法律委托案例
  3. 廖志明等人不服龙南县公安局治安行政处罚一案

廖志明等人不服龙南县公安局治安行政处罚一案

廖志明等人不服龙南县公安局治安行政处罚一案上诉人(原审原告)廖志明,男,1953年9月生,汉族,农民,住龙南县龙南镇大罗村永镇村小组。上诉人(原审原告)廖晓鹏(廖小朋),男,1964年5月生,汉族,农民,住址同上。上诉人(原审原告)廖光金,男,1943年3月生,汉族,农民,住址同上。委托代理人廖岳辉,男,1964年5月生,汉族,农民,住龙南县马牯塘镇寨背村。被上诉人(原审被告)龙南县公安局。法定代表人谢建林,局长。委托代理人赖建平,该局法制室主任。委托代理人钟俐,该局法制室民警。上诉人廖志明、廖光金、廖晓鹏因治安行政处罚一案,不服龙南县人民法院(2009)龙行初字第3号行政判决,向本院提起上诉。本院依法组成合议庭,于2009年5月6日公开开庭审理了本案。上诉人廖志明、廖光金、廖晓鹏(未到庭)及委托...

廖志明等人不服龙南县公安局治安行政处罚一案上诉人(原审原告)廖志明,男,1953年9月生,汉族,农民,住龙南县龙南镇大罗村永镇村小组。 上诉人(原审原告)廖晓鹏(廖小朋),男,1964年5月生,汉族,农民,住址同上。 上诉人(原审原告)廖光金,男,1943年3月生,汉族,农民,住址同上。 委托代理人廖岳辉,男,1964年5月生,汉族,农民,住龙南县马牯塘镇寨背村。 被上诉人(原审被告)龙南县公安局。 法定代表人谢建林,局长。 委托代理人赖建平,该局法制室主任。 委托代理人钟俐,该局法制室民警。 上诉人廖志明、廖光金、廖晓鹏因治安行政处罚一案,不服龙南县人民法院(2009)龙行初字第3号行政判决,向本院提起上诉。本院依法组成合议庭,于2009年5月6日公开开庭审理了本案。上诉人廖志明、廖光金、廖晓鹏(未到庭)及委托代理人廖岳辉,被上诉人委托代理人赖建平、钟俐到庭参加诉讼。本案现已审理终结。 原审法院认定,2006年2月7日江西省国土资源厅作出赣国土资函〔2006〕119号《关于龙南县2005年度第一批次城市建设用地的批复》:“一、同意龙南县将龙南镇大罗村的农村集体农用地11.3800公顷(其中耕地8.9600公顷)转为建设用地并办理征地手续;另征收农村集体建设用地5.900公顷。以上共计批准建设用地17.2800公顷。按呈报的土地开发用途用于城市建设。二、……。”2006年11月9日龙南县国土资源局颁布征地迁坟公告,龙南县龙南镇大罗村寨背一、二村民小组、永镇第一、二、三、四村民小组不服,申请赣州市国土资源局行政复议。2007年3月15日赣州市国土资源局作出赣资国土资行复字(2007)1号行政复议决定书:决定撤销龙南县国土资源局2006年11月9日发布的《征地迁坟公告》。2007年3月16日龙南县人民政府发出《关于征收龙南镇大罗村、寨背、永镇等八个村民小组集体土地的公告》,公告就征地补偿标准、征地时间等作出了说明。2007年1月22日龙南县人民政府办公室以龙府办批(2007)253号批复:“县工业园区管委会:……经县第十四届人民政府第八次常委会议研究,(1)原则同意实施龙翔大道延伸段路工程项目,你委为项目业主单位;(2)……”。2007年2月至11月大罗村永镇等村民在征用土地协议书和征收龙南镇大罗村永镇(等)组土地各种补偿明细表中就补偿款等事项签了名。2008年6月10日九江市第三建筑工程公司在龙南县龙翔大道延伸道路工程的施工中,因大罗村永镇村小组村民对县政府征地后安置的预留地不满,而受到村民的阻止施工,施工单位及时向被告报警,事后被告会同工业园区管委会、龙南镇人民政府等单位的工作人员对原告等人以予劝阻,并指明阻碍施工的违法性,但原告等人无视劝阻,多次阻碍施工。同年6月15日上午,原告等五十余名村民再次在施工现场阻拦工地上的车辆及工作人员进入,造成施工单位的经济损失。被告于2008年8月15日、16日以扰乱单位秩序,分别对廖小鹏,廖志明、廖光金行政拘留十五日,并执行完毕。原告等人不服被告作出的治安处罚具体行政行为。同年9月27日赣州市公安局作出赣市公行复字(2008)7号、8号、10号《行政复议决定书》,决定维持龙公(工)决字(2008)第526、530、534号行政处罚决定。2008年10月20日原告向该院提起行政诉讼,要求:1、判令撤销2008年6月15日被告对原告作出的行政处罚决定。2、判令被告依照民法及国家赔偿法对原告的精神损害、经济损失予以赔偿,在本县范围内作出公开道歉。3、判令被告承担本案诉讼费。4、请求将被告在行政执法中相关人员违纪违法的材料移送检察、监察部门。 原审法院认为,2008年6月10日至15日原告廖光金、廖志明等人多次到龙南县龙翔大道延伸路段施工现场阻碍施工,特别是15日相关单位赶赴现场及时劝阻的情况下,原告廖志明、廖光金等五十余人不听劝阻,阻止工地上的车辆及工作人员进入施工现场,导致建设单位无法施工。原告廖小鹏为永镇村小组组长,不劝阻村民依法行使自己的权益,牵头召集村小组人员参加村民大会,讨论村民到龙南镇龙翔大道东路施工工地上阻碍施工,向政府施加压力以引起政府重视,迫使政府另行安置预留地。以上事实有证人证言、当事人陈述及现场照片证实,事实清楚,证据确凿。被告龙南县公安局依照《中华人民共和国警察法》第六条第二项:“维护社会治安秩序,制止危害社会秩序的行为;”和《中华人民共和国治安管理处罚法》第二十三条第一款第(一)项、第二款:“有下列行为之一的,处警告或者二百元以下罚款;情节较重的,处五日以上十日以下拘留,可以并处五百元以下罚款;(一)扰乱机关、团体、企业、事业单位秩序,致使工作、生产、营业、医疗、教学、科研不能正常进行,尚未造成严重损失的”;“聚众实施前款行为的,对首要分子处十日以上十五日以下拘留,可以并处一千元以下罚款。”及第九十一条:“治安管理处罚由县级以上人民政府公安机关决定;其中警告、五百元以下的罚款可以由公安派出所决定”的规定,适用法律正确,执法主体合法。原告认为被告超越和滥用职权,该院不予采信。被告龙南县公安局在接到建设单位报案后,履行了传唤、询问、取证、告知,然后裁决的规定程序,有记录在卷证实,原告认为被告的程序违法,该院不予采纳。原告认为,县政府违反土地征收的有关规定,在未征得国家有关部门批准和并未妥善安置和解决被征地村民生产、生活的情况下,强行征收土地,被告不顾村民的正当合法权益,制止原告的正当行为,其大前提违法,小前提更违法,所以作出的具体行政行为也不合法。该院认为,征收土地的具体行政行为是否合法,不是本案审理的范畴,本案要审理的是被告龙南县公安局具体行政行为是否合法。本案中原告不听劝阻,并多次阻碍合法取得工程施工单位的施工,并在聚众扰乱施工单位秩序中起着首要作用,被告依据有关法律法规的规定,对原告等作出行政处罚,证据确实,程序合法,适用法律正确。原告要求判令被告依照民法及国家赔偿法对原告的精神损害、经济损失予以赔偿,在本县范围内作出公开的赔礼道歉,该院不予支持。该院根据《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》第五十四条第一款第(一)项和《最高人民法院关于执行〈中华人民共和国行政诉讼法〉若干问题的解释》第五十五条的规定,判决:一、维持被告龙南县公安局龙公(工)决字[2008]526号、530号、534号行政处罚决定。二、驳回原告的其他诉讼请求。案件受理费50元,由原告负担。

The person such as Liao Zhiming refuses to obey administration of public security of public security bureau of the county austral dragon punishs one case appellant (first trial accuser) Liao Zhiming, male, unripe in September 1953, the Han nationality, farmer, live to press down big Luo Cun to always press down village group south dragon south prefectural dragon. Appellant (first trial accuser) Liao Xiaopeng (Liao Xiaopeng) , male, unripe in May 1964, the Han nationality, farmer, address is Alexandrine. Appellant (first trial accuser) Liao Guangjin, male, unripe in March 1943, the Han nationality, farmer, address is Alexandrine. Attorney Liao Yuehui, male, unripe in May 1964, the Han nationality, farmer, live south dragon stockaded village of town of pond of prefectural horse bull carries a village on the back. Appellee (first trial the accused) public security bureau of Long Na county. Legal representative Xie Jianlin, director. Attorney Lai Jianping, director of room of this bureau legal system. Attorney bell Li, policeman of room of this bureau legal system. Appellant Liao Zhiming, Liao Guangjin, Liao Xiaopeng punishs one case because of public security administration, refuse to obey court of people of the county austral dragon (2009) the 3rd administration adjudicates Long Hangchu word, mention to this academy appeal. This academy comprises collegiate bench lawfully, heard this case at making public open a court session on May 6, 2009. Appellant Liao Zhiming, Liao Guangjin, Liao Xiaopeng (did not arrive front courtyard) reach attorney Liao Yuehui, appellee attorney Lai Jianping, Zhong Li joins suit to front courtyard. This case already was tried now terminative. First trial court is maintained, office of natural resources of Jiangxi province land made land of another name for Jiangxi Province on Feburary 7, 2006 2006 〕 of endowment case 〔 119 " about Long Na county construction of city of the first batch uses 2005 year the give an official of the ground " : "One, the rural collective that agrees with the county austral dragon to press down Long Na big Luo Cun is agricultural the ground 11.38 hectare (among them farmland 8.96 hectare) turn to use the ground to deal with; of the formalities that ask for the ground for construction additional collect a rural area collective construction uses the land 5.9 hectare. Above adds up to approval construction uses the land 17.28 hectare. By the land that report development use is used at urban construction. 2, ... . " bureau of natural resources of land of the county austral dragon issued graveyard announcement of the change that ask for the ground on November 9, 2006, long Na presses down stockaded village of big Luo Cun to carry on the back south prefectural dragon one, 2 villager groups, always press down the first, 2, 3, 4 villagers group refuses to obey, administration of bureau of natural resources of land of city of state of application another name for Jiangxi Province is reconsidered. Bureau of natural resources of land of city of state of another name for Jiangxi Province made land of endowment of another name for Jiangxi Province on March 15, 2007 endowment travel answer word (2007) an administration reconsiders decision book: Decide bureau of natural resources of land of the county austral cancel dragon was released on November 9, 2006 " graveyard announcement of the change that ask for the ground " . Government of people of the county austral dragon was given out on March 16, 2007 " carry on the back about collecting Long Na to press down big Luo Cun, stockaded village, always press down the announcement that waits for land of collective of 8 villagers group " , announcement asks for the ground to compensate the standard, time that ask for the ground to wait made a specification. Office of government of people of the county austral dragon did with dragon government office on January 22, 2007 batch (2007) 253 give an official: "Area of prefectural industry garden is in charge of appoint meeting: ... via the county conference of 8 members of standing committee studies mansion of civil administration of the 14th person, (1) the principle agrees to carry out Long Xiang highway project of project of outspread Duan Lu, you appoint for project owner unit; (2) ... " . Always pressed down to big in November Luo Cun in Feburary 2007 wait for the villager to be mixed in commandeer land agreement collect Long Na to always press down big Luo Cun (etc) group land compensated the item such as the paragraph to sign a name in all sorts of compensation list. Company of engineering of the 3rd construction was in 9 rivers city on June 10, 2008 highway of Long Xiang of the county austral dragon is outspread in the construction of civil engineer, the obligate ground that because big Luo Cun always presses down village group,finds a place for is malcontent, and get of the villager stop construction, construction unit calls the police in time to the accused, the accused of after the event is in charge of jointly with industrial garden area appoint the staff member that the unit such as people government presses down south meeting, dragon waits for a person to be dissuaded in order to grant to accuser, and the illegal sex of construction of demonstrate block up, but the person such as accuser is disregarded dissuade, for many times block up construction. Of the same age on June 15 morning, more than 50 villagers such as accuser reach a staff member to enter in the car on building site of construction site block the way again, cause the pecuniary loss of construction unit. The accused on August 15, 2008, 16 days with disturbed unit order, be opposite respectively Liao Xiaopeng, administration of Liao Zhiming, Liao Guangjin detains 15 days, carry out end. The person such as accuser refuses to obey the public security that the accused makes punishs specific administration action. Public security bureau of city of state of another name for Jiangxi Province will make the same year on September 27 city of another name for Jiangxi Province is fair travel answer word (2008) 7, 8, 10 " administration reconsiders decision book " , the decision maintains dragon fair (labour) definitely word (2008) the 526th, 530, 534 administration punish a decision. Accuser mentioned lawsuit of politics of start on a journey to this courtyard on October 20, 2008, requirement: 1, sentence your cancel the administration that the accused made to accuser on June 15, 2008 punishs a decision. 2, sentence civil code of according to of your the accused and national compensation law to be damaged to the spirit of accuser, pecuniary loss gives compensation, public apology is made inside this prefectural limits. 3, sentence your the accused to bear this case legal cost. 4, the data that in requesting to execute the law the accused in administration, relevant personnel violates discipline to break the law moves send procuratorial work, censorial department. First trial court thinks, to 15 days of accuser the person such as Liao Guangjin, Liao Zhiming arrived for many times on June 10, 2008 south dragon highway of prefectural Long Xiang is outspread construction of block up of site of construction of a section of a highway, especially 15 days of relevant units drive the circumstance that goes to the spot to be dissuaded in time to fall, the more than 50 people such as accuser Liao Zhiming, Liao Guangjin do not listen dissuade, prevent the car on building site and staff member to enter construction site, cause construction unit cannot construction. Accuser Liao Xiaopeng is always press down village group group leader, do not dissuade the villager lawfully him exercise rights and interests, take the lead call together village panel staff to attend villager plenary meeting, discussion villager presses down Long Xiang highway to Long Na east construction of the block up on road construction building site, apply force to take seriously in order to cause a government to the government, force a government to find a place for separately obligate ground. Above fact has state of witness testimony, party and spot photograph to confirm, the fact is clear, evidential authentic. According to of public security bureau of the county austral the accused dragon " law of police of People's Republic of China " the 6th the 2nd: "Uphold order of security of society, check the behavior that endangers social order; " and " management of public security of People's Republic of China sanctions a method " the 23rd the first (one) , the 2nd: "Have one of following action, place warning perhaps fines 200 yuan below; The clue is heavier, be in 5 days of above 10 days to be detained below, can be in 500 yuan of the following amerce; (one) order of disturbed mechanism, organization, enterprise, institution, cause the job, production, do business, medical treatment, education, scientific research cannot on the rails, have not cause serious losing " ; "Gather a crowd of behavior of the money before carrying out, be in 10 days of above 15 days to be detained below to first member, can be in 1000 yuan of the following amerce. " pass an imperial examination 91: "Public security manages punishment to be decided by mechanism of public security of government of people of prefectural class above; Among them 500 yuan of warning, the following amerce can be decided by public security police station " regulation, applicable law is correct, execute the law principal part is legitimate. Accuser thinks the accused is surmounted with misuse of authority, this courtyard does not grant to collect a letter. Public security bureau of the county austral the accused dragon is in after receiving construction unit to report a case to the security authorities, fulfilled subpoena, inquiry, obtain evidence, inform, the formulary program that adjudicates on next, have a record coiling confirm, accuser thinks the program of the accused breaks the law, this courtyard does not grant to adopt. Accuser thinks, prefectural government disobeys what land collects to concern a provision, in did not ask for so that the country concerns the case that the branch is approved and did not settle production of villager of the ground that be asked for, life to fall, collect land forcibly, the accused disregards the proper and legitimate rights and interests of the villager, check the appropriate action of accuser, its major premise breaks the law, minor premise more break the law, the specific administration action that makes so is illegimate also. This courtyard thinks, the specific administration action that collects land is legal, not be the category that this case tries, what this case should try is public security bureau of the county austral the accused dragon specific administration action is legal. The accuser in this case does not listen dissuade, and for many times the construction that block up acquires engineering construction unit legally, be in gather a crowd there is first effect in order of disturbed construction unit, the accused basis concerns the provision of legal laws and regulations, wait to accuser make administrative punishment, evidence really, the process is legal, applicable law is correct. Accuser asks to sentence civil code of according to of your the accused and national compensation law to be damaged to the spirit of accuser, pecuniary loss gives compensation, make inside this prefectural limits make an apology publicly, this courtyard does not grant to support. This courtyard basis " procedural law of administration of People's Republic of China " fiftieth 4 the first (one) and " top people court about carrying out < procedural law of administration of People's Republic of China > the explanation of a certain number of problems " fiftieth 5 regulation, court decision: One, maintain public security bureau of the county austral the accused dragon dragon is fair (labour) definitely word [decision of punishment of 2008]526 date, 534 530 date, administration. 2, the other suit request that rejects accuser. The case accepts fee 50 yuan, by accuser burden.

本文来自投稿,不代表君士君法律咨询网立场,如若转载,请注明出处:http://www.junshijun.com/wts/8.html