1. 首页
  2. 法律委托案例
  3. “河北超生女婴被抱走”案二审驳回上诉维持原判

“河北超生女婴被抱走”案二审驳回上诉维持原判

河北超生女婴被抱走案二审驳回上诉维持原判中新网3月27日电据保定市中级人民法院官方微博消息,引起社会多方关注的河北省安新县农民因18年前超生女婴被抱走至今下落不明而状告县政府信息不公开一案,27日上午经保定市中级人民法院行政庭审理后,依法作出二审判决,驳回上诉,维持原判。3月27日,上诉人刘老根、夏凤各要求安新县人民政府信息公开一案,经保定市中级人民法院行政庭审理后,依法作出二审判决,驳回上诉,维持原判。15时20分,二上诉人委托代理人刘领群(刘老根、夏凤各之子)到保定中院领取了判决书。1995年5月28日,圈头乡桥南村农民刘老根、夏凤各夫妇的第3个孩子降生,是个女儿。因不符合计划生育规定,同年6月7日晚上,乡政府领...

河北超生女婴被抱走案二审驳回上诉维持原判

中新网3月27日电 据保定市中级人民法院官方微博消息,引起社会多方关注的河北省安新县农民因18年前超生女婴被抱走至今下落不明而状告县政府信息不公开一案,27日上午经保定市中级人民法院行政庭审理后,依法作出二审判决,驳回上诉,维持原判。

3月27日,上诉人刘老根、夏凤各要求安新县人民政府信息公开一案,经保定市中级人民法院行政庭审理后,依法作出二审判决,驳回上诉,维持原判。15时20分,二上诉人委托代理人刘领群(刘老根、夏凤各之子)到保定中院领取了判决书。

1995年5月28日,圈头乡桥南村农民刘老根、夏凤各夫妇的第3个孩子降生,是个女儿。因不符合计划生育规定,同年6月7日 晚上,乡政府领导派当时在乡派出所当临时工的村民夏金成来到其家中,劝说夫妇二人将孩子送人,遭到拒绝。1995年6月8日,他们出生11天的女儿被人留 下400元钱强行抱走,至今下落不明。

据了解,刘老根夫妇于2013年11月4日下午正式向圈头乡派出所报案,安新县公安局立即抽调专门力量就此案进行调查。随后,刘家又就该事件提起行政诉讼,请求法院依法判决被告安新县人民政府履行信息公开义务,要求明确告知圈头乡人民政府1995年6月8日对原告处罚的信息,以及被处罚的女儿送 养及收养情况。

该案被指定高碑店市人民法院立案审理。12月3日下午,高碑店市法院依法对该案开庭审理。27日上午在保定高碑店市法院一审宣判。法院判决:驳回原告刘老根、夏凤各的诉讼请求。

Heibei exceeds unripe female baby to be held in the arms case 2 careful reject appeal to maintain original judgement

In report occupied new network on March 27 message of small gain of government of court of Baoding city intermediate people, because 18 exceed unripe female baby to be held in the arms before New Year,the Heibei province that causes a society to pay close attention to with all possible means brings new county farmer miss up to now and shape accuses underground of prefectural government information one case, after via Baoding city front courtyard of administration of intermediate people court is tried 27 days morning, make 2 careful adjudicate lawfully, reject appeal, maintain original judgement.

On March 27, appellant Liu old root, Xia Feng asks to install information of government of new county people to publish one proposal each, after via Baoding city front courtyard of administration of intermediate people court is tried, make 2 careful adjudicate lawfully, reject appeal, maintain original judgement. 15 when 20 minutes, liu Lingqun of 2 appellant attorney (Liu Laogen, Xia Feng each child) received report to Baoding quadrangle.

On May 28, 1995, old root of Liu of farmer of the village austral bridge of the countryside that encircle a head, Xia Feng the 3rd child of each couple is born, it is a daughter. Because do not accord with family planning to set, of the same age on June 7 in the evening, style of country government leader is become in country police station at that time Xia Jincheng comes to the villager of casual in its home, persuade 2 people of connubial to send a person the child, refuse. On June 8, 1995, the daughter that they are born 11 days is left 400 yuan of Qian Jiang are held in the arms all right, miss up to now.

As we have learned, liu Laogen's couple reported a case to the security authorities formally afternoon to police station of the country that encircle a head on November 4, 2013, install new county public security bureau to transfer instantly special force at this point case undertake investigating. Subsequently, liu Jia mentions lawsuit of politics of start on a journey with respect to this incident again, request court adjudicates the accused installs government of new county people to fulfill information to make public obligation lawfully, the information that the requirement imparts government of people of the country that encircle a head clearly to was punished to accuser on June 8, 1995, and be sent to raise by condemnatory daughter reach foster situation.

This case is appointed cognizance of put on record of court of people of city of tall tablet inn. On December 3 afternoon, court of justice of town of tall tablet inn is tried to this case open a court session lawfully. In Baoding first instance of court of justice of town of tall tablet inn is adjudged 27 days morning. Forensic court decision: Reject accuser Liu Laogen, Xia Feng each litigant request.

本文来自投稿,不代表君士君法律咨询网立场,如若转载,请注明出处:http://www.junshijun.com/wts/7.html