1. 首页
  2. 法律委托案例
  3. 国家知识产权局专利复审委员会等与陈镜钊实用新型专利权无效行政纠纷一案

国家知识产权局专利复审委员会等与陈镜钊实用新型专利权无效行政纠纷一案

国家知识产权局专利复审委员会等与陈镜钊实用新型专利权无效行政纠纷一案上诉人(原审被告)国家知识产权局专利复审委员会,住所地北京市海淀区北四环西路9号银谷大厦10-12层。法定代表人廖涛,副主任。委托代理人刘路尧,该委员会审查员。委托代理人杨存吉,该委员会审查员。上诉人(原审第三人)朱炽坡,男,汉族,1974年7月20日出生,住广州市萝岗区笔岗浦下街8号。被上诉人(原审原告)陈镜钊,男,汉族,1966年11月13日出生,广州市增城宇成服装工艺制品厂业主,住广东省增城市新塘镇西洲村东平坊...

国家知识产权局专利复审委员会等与陈镜钊实用新型专利权无效行政纠纷一案上诉人(原审被告)国家知识产权局专利复审委员会,住所地北京市海淀区北四环西路9号银谷大厦10-12层。 法定代表人廖涛,副主任。 委托代理人刘路尧,该委员会审查员。 委托代理人杨存吉,该委员会审查员。 上诉人(原审第三人)朱炽坡,男,汉族,1974年7月20日出生,住广州市萝岗区笔岗浦下街8号。 被上诉人(原审原告)陈镜钊,男,汉族,1966年11月13日出生,广州市增城宇成服装工艺制品厂业主,住广东省增城市新塘镇西洲村东平坊隔基新村七巷6号。 委托代理人王广华,广东三环汇华律师事务所律师。 委托代理人童轶芳,女,汉族,1986年10月20日出生,广东三环汇华律师事务所律师助理,住广东省广州市东山区中山二路74号大院。 上诉人国家知识产权局专利复审委员会(简称专利复审委员会)、朱炽坡因实用新型专利权无效行政纠纷一案,不服北京市第一中级人民法院(2008)一中行初字第1584号行政判决,向本院提起上诉。本院2009年5月11日受理后,依法组成合议庭,于2009年6月30日公开开庭进行了审理。上诉人专利复审委员会的委托代理人刘路尧、杨存吉,上诉人朱炽坡,被上诉人陈镜钊的委托代理人王广华、童轶芳到庭参加了诉讼。本案现已审理终结。 北京市第一中级人民法院认定,朱炽坡是“牛仔裤表面工艺处理用橡胶裤套”实用新型专利(简称本专利)的专利权人。针对本专利权,陈镜钊于2008年1月8日向专利复审委员会提出无效宣告请求。专利复审委员会经审查,于2008年7月2日作出第12010无效宣告请求审查决定(简称第12010号无效决定),维持本专利权有效。 北京市第一中级人民法院认为,陈镜钊提交的证据1和补充证据1-4无法形成有效的证据链用以证明本专利权利要求1已经了丧失新颖性,也无法证明权利要求2已经丧失了创造性。陈镜钊提交的证据2和补充证据5可以证明2006年8月31日今日新塘网站上发布了“立式移动马骝机”的图片。由于该图片的发布时间在本专利的申请日之前,可以作为本专利的对比文件评价本专利的新颖性和创造性,专利复审委员会应当在此基础上对该图片是否影响本专利的新颖性和创造性作出评价。专利复审委员会作出的第12010号决定认定事实不清,适用法律错误,依法应当予以撤销。专利复审委员会应当重新作出无效宣告请求审查决定。 北京市第一中级人民法院依据《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》第五十四条第(二)项第1、2目的规定,判决:(一)撤销专利复审委员会作出的第12010号无效决定;(二)专利复审委员会就陈镜钊针对本专利权提出的无效宣告请求重新作出审查决定。 专利复审委员会、朱炽坡不服一审判决,向本院提起上诉。 专利复审委员会的上诉理由是:网址为www.jrxt.com的今日新塘网站是地区性信息平台,目的是企业和个人的信息共享和交流,且该网站声明对该网站上的信息由企业自行分布,由企业对信息的真实性、准确性、合法性负责,该网站不承担保证责任,其信誉度不高。即使信息分布人难以对发布时间进行更改,但陈镜钊未提交证据证明在今日新塘网站上的图片未进行更改,也未提交证据证明在本专利申请日前访问今日新塘网站可以链接到包含涉案图片的页面,仅能证明今日新塘网站在分布时间发布了网页信息中的文字内容,但专利复审委员会对涉案公证书所附的2008年2月4日访问的网页信息中图片是否与本专利申请日前访问的网页信息中图片相一致存在合理怀疑。在没有其它证据佐证的情况下,仅凭证据2和补充证据5不能认定本专利申请日之前在今日新塘网站上已经公开发表与本专利权利要求1相同的牛仔裤表面工艺处理用橡胶裤套的事实。请求撤销一审判决,维持第12010号无效决定。 朱炽坡的上诉理由是:在计算机网络上的信息存在太大的不确定性是众所周知的事实,证据2是计算机网络上的信息,在足够的经济利益的驱使下,是一定可以和可能实施网络数据变动的。陈镜钊在今日新塘网站上实施了数据变动,将证据2中的图片所附带的信息全部改变了。本专利是实用新型专利,不是外观设计专利,一幅图是不能披露本专利权利要求的内容的。请求撤销一审判决;维持专利复审委员会第12010号无效决定;判令陈镜钊承担诉讼费。

The practical and as new-style as Chen Jingzhao patent such as committee of review a case of patent of bureau of national intellectual property is invalid administrative dispute one case appellant (first trial the accused) committee of review a case of patent of bureau of national intellectual property, north of area of Haidian of abode ground Beijing 4 annulus on the west road edifice of 9 Yin Gu 10 - 12. Legal representative Liao Tao, vice director. Attorney Liu Lu Yao, this committee examinant. Attorney Yang Cunji, this committee examinant. Appellant (first trial the 3rd person) Zhu Chi slope, male, the Han nationality, was born on July 20, 1974, live below riverside of hillock of pen of area of hillock of Guangzhou city trailing plants street 8. Appellee (first trial accuser) Chen Jingzhao, male, the Han nationality, was born on November 13, 1966, guangzhou city adds town house to become owner of plant of dress technology products, stay in Guangdong the province adds urban new pool to press down continent village Dong Pingfang is lain between on the west base new residential quarter 7 alley 6. Attorney Wang Anhua, 3 annulus of Guangdong are collected China attorney office solicitor. Attorney Tong Yifang, female, the Han nationality, was born on October 20, 1986, 3 annulus of Guangdong are collected China assistant of attorney office solicitor, stay in Guangdong to visit Guangzhou town east a mountainous area Zhongshan 2 74 date courtyard. Committee of review a case of patent of bureau of appellant country intellectual property (committee of abbreviation patent review a case) , Zhu Chi slope disables because of practical and new-style patent administrative dispute one case, refuse to obey Beijing court of the first intermediate people (2008) one in the 1584th administration adjudicates the word at the beginning of travel, mention to this academy appeal. After this academy was accepted on May 11, 2009, comprise collegiate bench lawfully, undertook cognizance at making public open a court session on June 30, 2009. The attorney Liu Lu Yao of committee of appellant patent review a case, Yang Cunji, slope of appellant Zhu Chi, the attorney Wang Anhua of appellee Chen Jingzhao, Tong Yifang joined suit to front courtyard. This case already was tried now terminative. Court of the first intermediate people maintains Beijing, slope of bright red ablaze is " processing of jeans surface craft is covered with balata pants " practical and new-style patent (abbreviation this patent) patent person. Be aimed at this patent, chen Jingzhao put forward invalid declare to request to patent reexamine committee on January 8, 2008. Committee classics investigates patent review a case, at making the 12010th invalid declaration on July 2, 2008 the request examines a decision (abbreviation disables the 12010th number decision) , maintain this patent effective. Beijing court of the first intermediate people thinks, the evidence that Chen Jingzhao submits 1 with adminicle 1 - 4 cannot form effective evidential catenary in order to to prove this patent benefit asks 1 already lose novel sex, also cannot prove the right asks 2 had lost creativity. The evidence that Chen Jingzhao submits 2 with adminicle 5 can prove to be released on website of new now on August 31, 2006 pool " machine of Liu of vertical shift horse " picture. As a result of the issuance of this picture time is before this patent application day, the comparative file that can serve as this patent evaluates this patent novel sex and creativity, patent reexamine committee ought to is opposite on this foundation the novel sex that whether this picture affects this patent and creativity make an assessment. The 12010th decision cognizance fact that patent reexamine committee makes is not clear, applicable law is wrong, ought to give lawfully cancel. Patent reexamine committee ought to make invalid declare request to examine a decision afresh. Beijing basis of court of the first intermediate people " procedural law of administration of People's Republic of China " fiftieth 4 (2) the 1st, 2 purposes regulation, court decision: (one) the 12010th when committee of cancel patent review a case makes invalid decision; (2) the invalid declare request that patent reexamine committee puts forward in the light of this patent with respect to Chen Jingzhao is made afresh examine a decision. Slope of patent reexamine committee, bright red ablaze refuses to obey first instance court decision, mention to this academy appeal. A:appellant reason of patent reexamine committee is: The website of new now pool that network address is Www.jrxt.com is regional information platform, the information that the purpose is enterprise and individual is shared and communicate, and this website statement distributings by company proper motion to the information on this website, be in charge of to the authenticity of information, accuracy, lawful sex by the enterprise, this website is not assumed assure responsibility, its credit is spent not tall. Although information distributings,the person undertakes changing to releasing time hard, but the picture that Chen Jingzhao did not refer evidential proof to go up in website of new now pool did not undertake changing, it is OK to also did not refer evidence to prove to apply for to visited website of new now pool a few days ago in this patent catenary receives the page that includes experience case picture, can prove website of new now pool released the literal content in webpage information in distributinging time only, but photograph of the picture in the webpage information that whether the picture in the visited on Feburary 4, 2008 webpage information that patent reexamine committee adds to experience case notarial deed visited a few days ago with this patent application exists consistently reasonable suspicion. Below the circumstance that does not have other testimony evidence, only the proof is occupied 2 with adminicle 5 before cannot identifying definitive edition patent to apply for day, go up to publish what ask with this patent benefit exterior craft handles 1 identical jeans to be covered with balata pants already publicly in website of new now pool. Request cancel first instance to adjudicate, keep the 12010th invalid decision. A:appellant reason of slope of bright red ablaze is: The uncertainty with the information too big presence on computer network is well-known fact, evidence 2 it is the information on computer network, in enough economic interest drive below, can carry out network data to change with the likelihood certainly. Chen Jingzhao carried out data to change on website of new now pool, testimony the information with accessary place changed 2 medium pictures entirely. This patent is practical and new-style patent, not be exterior design patent, a graph is the content that cannot disclose this patent right to ask. Request cancel first instance to adjudicate; Keep patent reexamine commission the 12010th invalid decision; Sentence your Chen Jingzhao bears legal cost.

本文来自投稿,不代表君士君法律咨询网立场,如若转载,请注明出处:http://www.junshijun.com/wts/26812.html