1. 首页
  2. 法律委托案例
  3. 陈某诉刘某身体权纠纷案

陈某诉刘某身体权纠纷案

陈某诉刘某身体权纠纷案重庆市开县人民法院民事裁判书(2012)开法民初字第00378号原告陈某。委托代理人张明中,开县法律援助中心法律工作者。委托代理人陈某某。被告刘某。委托代理人王英(特别授权)。原告陈某与被告刘某身体权纠纷一案,本院于2012年1月9日立案受理后,依法组成合议庭,公开开庭进行了审理。原、被告及双方的委托代理人均到庭参加了诉讼。本案现已审理终结。原告陈某诉称:2011年2月14日上午,被告刘某将地里的草甩到刚疏通的檐沟里,我去劝阻被告,不料被告又故...

陈某诉刘某身体权纠纷案

重庆市开县人民法院

民事裁判书

(2012)开法民初字第00378号

原告陈某。

委托代理人张明中,开县法律援助中心法律工作者。

委托代理人陈某某。

被告刘某。

委托代理人王英(特别授权)。

原告陈某与被告刘某身体权纠纷一案,本院于2012年1月9日立案受理后,依法组成合议庭,公开开庭进行了审理。原、被告及双方的委托代理人均到庭参加了诉讼。本案现已审理终结。

原告陈某诉称:2011年2月14日上午,被告刘某将地里的草甩到刚疏通的檐沟里,我去劝阻被告,不料被告又故意甩了一把草,从而将我激怒,于是我就去拔被告地里的青菜,被告就提起锄头将我的臀部打了几下。我抓住锄头不放,后来被黄兆香将锄头抢走。争执中被告将我致伤,经赵家中心卫生院诊断为:左腰部皮肤擦伤伴淤血,双臀部软组织损伤,住院治疗用去医疗费813.18元。经派出所调解未能达成协议。因镇级医院设备不齐未及时治愈双臀软组织损伤的筋膜炎,造成双臀软组织损伤长期疼痛难忍,于2011年11月15日至2011年12月15日在重庆第三军医大第一附属医院西南医院治疗29天,确诊医疗费12981.6元。因双臀筋膜受损,今后可能再复发再住院治疗,故请求法院判决被告赔偿我医疗费等费用共计20000元。

被告刘某辩称:2011年2月14日上午,我在自家菜地里除草,并没有将草扔进原告所说的水沟里。原告以我将草扔进水沟为由发生口头争执,并来扯我地里的青菜才导致纠纷的产生。原告动手欲从我手中抢走锄头,我为了避免争抢过程中发生损伤,当场松手放下锄头,并没有如原告所说的用锄头将原告打伤。原告在我菜地里打滚,并将我的一整片菜全部滚死。由于冬天地里的土地很硬,原告所说的伤应是他自己在打滚时被土块和菜根所伤,并非由我造成的。纠纷发生后,经村委和赵家派出所共同调解,于2011年2月23日形成一份治安调解协议书,由村支部书记李万鹏出资50元,并委托派出所民警朱玉飞较交给原告之女陈中英作为补偿。总之,我没有打伤原告,不应承担赔偿责任,请求法院驳回原告的诉讼请求。

原告陈某为证明其主张,向本院提交了下列证据:

1、户口证明,拟证明原、被告的身份情况。

2、开县赵家派出所对刘某的询问笔录,拟证明事件经过,被告将原告致伤。

3、开县赵家街道和平村民委员会的证明,拟证明被告将原告致伤。

4、开县公安局赵家派出所治安调解协议书,拟证明被告存在过错,并将原告致伤。

5、西南医院的费用清单,拟证明原告在该院就诊情况,花费医疗费12981.6元。

6、中国人民解放军医疗单位专用收费票据,拟证明花费的医疗费及报销情况。

7、疾病诊断书、医疗费收据等,拟证明陈某的就诊情况及花费医疗费情况。

8、三峡中心医院诊断证明书,拟证明陈某之前没有筋膜炎。

9、西南医院住院病历首页,拟证明陈某在该医院治疗情况。

10、卫生制度,拟证明被告没有遵守相关规定。

被告刘某的质证意见是:证据1-4无异议。证据5、9有异议。证据6、7有异议,原告受伤是自己打滚造成的。证据8有异议,是常规疾病。证据10有异议。

被告刘某为证明其主张,向本院提交了下列证据:

11、开县公安局赵家派出所治安调解协议书,拟证明原、被告的纠纷已经在派出所的主持下达成调解意见,原告的伤并不是被告造成的。

12、开县赵家街道和平村民委员会的证明,拟证明原、被告的纠纷已调解,事情已处理完毕。

13、出庭证人王菊中的证言,拟证明被告没有用锄头打原告,原告的妻子将锄头拿走后,原告就躺在地上,之后被告就走了,双方也未再发生其他纠纷。

14、出庭证人黄凤国的证言,拟证明被告没有打原告,也不愿意赔钱,但村支书为了化解矛盾就给了原告50元作为补偿。

15、出庭证人黄凤军的证言,拟证明被告没有打原告,原告有在菜地打滚的痕迹,自已也参与了调解工作。

16、出庭证人魏延翠的证言,拟证明原告的妻子将锄头拿走并递给我后,原告就躺在地上打滚。被告没有打原告。

17、出庭证人李万鹏的证言,拟证明被告没有打原告,但为了化解矛盾,村支部书记李万鹏出资50元补偿给原告。

原告陈某的质证意见是:证据11有异议,陈中英是我女儿,她没有我的授权,我没有直接参与调解。赔偿50元也说明有发生纠纷的事实。证据12主持调解是事实,女儿转交50元给我。证据13有异议,双方有抢锄头的事实,且证明原告没有打滚。证据14黄凤国只对调解事实有所了解。证据15有异议。证据16魏延翠没有看见抢锄头,且与证据13相矛盾。证据17基本无异议。

结合原、被告的举证、质证意见以及本案的实际情况,本院的认证意见是:

证据1,被告无异议,本院依法予以采纳并采信。证据2系公安机关出具的询问笔录,形式合法有效,本院依法予以采纳;对于所证明的内容,本院将结合其他证据予以综合认定。证据3、4与证据11、12原、被告双方均出示一份,对其真实性本院予以认可。证据5、6、7本院将结合其他证据予以综合认定。证据8根据2010年12月31日三峡中心医院的诊断证明书,可以看出原告之前就患有双臀疼痛、腰椎间盘突出、颈椎病等疾病与证据9中诊断的疾病相吻合,故本院无法确认原告此次所患双臀筋膜炎是不是由被告造成的,且原告也没提供其他证据予以佐证,故对原告所受损伤本院无法认定。证据10与本案无关。证据13、15、16中的证人王菊中、黄凤军、魏延翠均到达过现场,且也出庭作证;证据14、17两证人均参与事后调解工作,且也出庭作证,这五名证人的证言能够相互印证。另外,证据13-17与证据11、12也能够相互印证,其证据的证明力大于原告所提供的证据的证明力,原告虽有异议,但没有提供足以反驳的相反证据予以证明,故对原告所主张的被告打伤原告的事实,原告应承担举证不能的法律责任。

根据原、被告的陈述、举证、质证以及本院的认证,本院确认如下法律事实:

2011年2月14日,原告陈某与被告刘某因邻里琐事发生纠纷,原告陈某称被告刘某用锄头将自己打伤,并向开县赵家派出所报警,经村委和开县赵家派出所共同调解,于2011年2月23日形成一份治安调解协议书,由村支部书记李万鹏出资50元,并委托派出所民警朱玉飞较交给原告之女陈中英作为补偿。原告陈某以自己没有参与调解和签字为由,不认可调解协议书。现原、被告就赔偿事宜未达成一致意见,原告遂起诉至我院,要求被告赔偿其损失。

Chen Mou appeals to desk of issue of authority of Liu Mou body

Chongqing city opens prefectural people court

Civil judgment book

(2012) opens the word at the beginning of law civilian the 00378th

Accuser Chen Mou.

In attorney Zhang Ming, law opening a county helps central law worker.

Attorney Chen Mou some.

The accused Liu Mou.

Attorney Wang Ying (special authorization) .

Issue of authority of body of accuser Chen Mou and the accused Liu Mou one case, this academy after put on record was accepted on January 9, 2012, comprise collegiate bench lawfully, open open a court session undertook cognizance. Former, the accused and bilateral attorney all joined suit to front courtyard. This case already was tried now terminative.

Accuser Chen Mou appeals to say: On Feburary 14, 2011 morning, the accused Liu Mou swings the grass in the ground in the eaves gutter of firm dredge, I go dissuading the accused, unexpectedly the accused swung a grass intentionally again, irritate me thereby, then I unplug the green vegetables in the accused ground, the accused mentions hoe hit my hip a few times. I capture hoe to be not put, be reaved hoe by Huang Zhaoxiang later. The accused in conflict sends me, via Zhao Jiazhong heart hospital diagnoses for: Abrade of left waist skin accompanies gore, double coxal parenchyma is injured, hospitalization uses medical treatment to expend 813.18 yuan. Via police station mediation fails to come to an agreement. The muscle film that because press down class hospital equipment to cure double buttock parenchyma not in time not together,injures is phlogistic, cause double buttock parenchyma to injure long-term ache to be borne hard, was in on December 15, 2011 at coming on November 15, 2011 Chongqing army medical service is great the hospital treats southwest of the first accessary hospital 29 days, diagnose medical treatment expends 12981.6 yuan. Because film of double buttock muscle is damaged, have a relapse possibly henceforth again again hospitalization, reason requests a court to adjudicate 20000 yuan to the accused compensates for the charge such as cost of my medical treatment to add up to.

Some argue of the accused Liu says: On Feburary 14, 2011 morning, I weed in oneself vegetable plot, did not throw grass into the ditch that accuser place says. Accuser is thrown into with my general grass oral conflict produces for ditch, will pull the green vegetables in my ground to just bring about the generation of dispute. Accuser starts work be about to reave hoe from inside my hand, I am grabbed to avoid to contend for loss produces in the process, on the spot let go puts down hoe, not was like what accuser place says to use hoe to maul accuser. Accuser rolls about in my vegetable plot, roll a whole my dish dead entirely. Because the land in winter ground is very hard, the injury that accuser place says should be him himself be mixed by clod when roll about injury of dish root place, be not what cause by me. After dispute happening, classics village appoint with Zhaojia police station is mediated jointly, mediate agreement at forming a public security on Feburary 23, 2011, by Li Mopeng of village branch secretary contributive 50 yuan, entrust Zhu Yufei of police station policeman relatively give the female Chen Zhongying of accuser serves as compensation. Anyhow, I did not maul accuser, should not assume liability to pay compensation, request court rejects the litigant request of accuser.

Accuser Chen Mou advocates to prove its, submitted following evidence to this academy:

1, proof of registered permanent residence, plan to prove the identity case of former, the accused.

2, police station of Zhaojia opening a county notes to Liu Mou's inquiry, plan to prove incident is passed, the accused sends accuser.

3, the proof of committee of villager of path peace of Zhao Jiajie opening a county, plan to prove the accused sends accuser.

4, public security of police station of Zhaojia of public security bureau opening a county mediates agreement, plan to prove mistake of the accused existence, send accuser.

5, the expense detailed account of southwest hospital, plan to prove accuser sees a doctor in this courtyard circumstance, expenses medical treatment expends 12981.6 yuan.

6, unit of medical treatment of the Chinese People's Liberation Army is special collect fees bill, the medical treatment cost that plans to prove to cost and submit an expense account circumstance.

7, receipt of cost of disease medical certificate, medical treatment, plan to prove circumstance of Chen Mou seeing a doctor and expenses medical treatment expend a circumstance.

8, hospital of 3 gorge center diagnoses certificate, there is muscle film before planning to prove Chen Mou phlogistic.

9, home page of anamnesis of southwest hospital be in hospital, plan to prove Chen Mou treats a condition in this hospital.

10, wholesome system, plan to prove the accused did not abide by relevant provision.

The qualitative card opinion of the accused Liu Mou is: Evidential 1-4 is consentient. Evidence 5, 9 disagree. Evidence 6, 7 disagree, accuser gets hurt is he roll about those who cause. Evidence 8 disagree, it is groovy disease. Evidence 10 disagree.

The accused Liu Mou advocates to prove its, submitted following evidence to this academy:

11, public security of police station of Zhaojia of public security bureau opening a county mediates agreement, the dispute that plans to prove former, the accused has been in of police station chair next reaching to mediate an opinion, the accused does not cause the injury of accuser.

12, the proof of committee of villager of path peace of Zhao Jiajie opening a county, plan to prove the dispute of former, the accused already was mediated, the thing already was handled end.

13, appear in court the attestation in witness king chrysanthemum, plan to prove the accused did not use hoe to call prosecutor, after the wife of accuser takes away hoe, accuser lies on the ground, defendant went later, bilateral not recurrent also other issue.

14, appear in court the witness fizzles out the attestation of phoenix country, plan to prove the accused did not call prosecutor, also not be willing be out of pocket, but village secretary of a Party or League branch serves as compensation 50 yuan to dissolved contradiction to give prosecutor.

15, appear in court the witness fizzles out Feng Jun's attestation, plan to prove the accused did not call prosecutor, accuser has the mark that rolls about in vegetable plot, also already shared intercessory work oneself.

16, appear in court witness the Kingdom of Wei delays emerald green attestation, the wife that plans to prove accuser takes away hoe and hand my hind, accuser lies on the ground to roll about. The accused did not call prosecutor.

17, appear in court the attestation of witness Li Mopeng, plan to prove the accused did not call prosecutor, but contradict to dissolve, li Mopeng of village branch secretary is contributive 50 yuan of compensation give prosecutor.

The qualitative card opinion of accuser Chen Mou is: Evidence 11 disagree, chen Zhongying is my daughter, she does not have my accredit, I did not participate in mediation directly. Compensation also explains 50 yuan have the fact that produces issue. Evidence 12 chairing mediation is a fact, daughter pass on gives me 50 yuan. Evidence 13 disagree, both sides has the fact that grabs hoe, and proof accuser did not roll about. 14 Huang Feng countries are opposite evidence only intercessory fact understands somewhat. Evidence 15 disagree. Yan Cui of 16 the Kingdom of Wei did not see evidence grab hoe, and with evidence 13 photographs contradict. Evidence 17 basic consentient.

Join opinion of the quote of former, the accused, qualitative card and the real case of this case, the attestation opinion of this academy is:

Evidence 1, the accused is consentient, this academy gives lawfully adopt and collect a letter. Evidence the 2 inquiries that fasten public security mechanism to issue note, the form is lawful and effective, this academy gives lawfully the content that adopts; to prove to place, this academy will combine other evidence to give maintain integratedly. Evidence 3, 4 with evidence 11, both sides of 12 former, the accused all shows, to its authenticity this academy gives approbate. Evidence 5, 6, 7 this academy will combine other evidence to give maintain integratedly. Evidence 8 basises on December 31, 2010 the diagnostic certificate of hospital of 3 gorge center, interverbebral disc of double buttock ache, waist suffers from before can seeing accuser disease and the evidence such as disease of outstanding, cervical vertebra 9 in evidential disease photograph be identical, reason this academy cannot affirm what accuser has film of double buttock muscle this phlogistic cause by the accused, and accuser also did not offer other evidence to give evidence, reason hurts this academy to cannot be maintained to what accuser is damaged. Evidence 10 have nothing to do with this case. Evidence 13, 15, medium, Huang Fengjun, Wei Yancui all has arrived at 16 medium witness king chrysanthemum the spot, and also appear in court attest; evidence 14, average per capita of 17 two card participates in after the event to mediate the job, and also appear in court attest, the attestation of these 5 witnesses can mutual confirm. Additional, evidential 13-17 and evidence 11, 12 also can mutual confirm, the proof force of the evidence that the proof muscularity of its evidence provides at accuser place, although accuser disagrees, but the photograph counterevidence that did not offer enough to refute proves according to giving, the accused that reason advocates to accuser place mauls the fact of accuser, accuser agree carries responsibility of quote incapable law.

According to the attestation of the allegation of former, the accused, quote, qualitative card and this academy, this academy acknowledges following legal facts:

On Feburary 14, 2011, accuser Chen Mou and the accused Liu Mou produce issue because of neighborhood bagatelle, accuser Chen Mou says the accused Liu Mou uses hoe to maul his, call the police to police station of opening a county Home Zhao, classics village appoint with Zhaojia opening a county police station is mediated jointly, mediate agreement at forming a public security on Feburary 23, 2011, by Li Mopeng of village branch secretary contributive 50 yuan, entrust Zhu Yufei of police station policeman relatively give the female Chen Zhongying of accuser serves as compensation. Accuser Chen Mou was not participated in with oneself mediate and sign for, do not approve intercessory agreement. Show former, the accused to compensate for matters concerned to did not reach unanimous opinion, accuser is sued then to my courtyard, requirement the accused recoups its loss.

本文来自投稿,不代表君士君法律咨询网立场,如若转载,请注明出处:http://www.junshijun.com/wts/26544.html