1. 首页
  2. 法律委托案例
  3. 新西兰THEATRELIGHTLTD与珠海市对外贸易经济合作局行政审批案

新西兰THEATRELIGHTLTD与珠海市对外贸易经济合作局行政审批案

新西兰THEATRELIGHTLTD与珠海市对外贸易经济合作局行政审批案广东省珠海市中级人民法院行政判决书(2003)珠中法行初字第7号原告:新西兰THEATRELIGHTLTD。地址:6ROWESTREET,P.O.BOX13-159ONEHUNGAAUCKLANDNEWZELAND。法定代表人:REXGILFILLAND,董事长。委托代理人:张洁、刘新,均为广东晨光律师事务所律师。被告:珠海市对外贸易经济合作局。地址:珠海市香洲区人民东路19号。法定代表人:熊灿均,局长。委托代理人:常征、温晓敏,均为该局公务员。第三人:珠海泰立灯光音响设计安装有限公司。法定代表人:郑大亨,总经理。委托代理人:邱小飞、赵瑜,广东大公威德律师事务所律师。第三人:珠海市中粤新通讯技...

新西兰THEATRELIGHTLTD与珠海市对外贸易经济合作局行政审批案

广东省珠海市中级人民法院行政判决书

(2003)珠中法行初字第7号

原告:新西兰THEATRELIGHTLTD。地址:6ROWESTREET,P.O.BOX13-159ONEHUNGAAUCKLANDNEWZELAND。法定代表人:REXGILFILLAND,董事长。委托代理人:张洁、刘新,均为广东晨光律师事务所律师。被告:珠海市对外贸易经济合作局。地址:珠海市香洲区人民东路19号。法定代表人:熊灿均,局长。委托代理人:常征、温晓敏,均为该局公务员。第三人:珠海泰立灯光音响设计安装有限公司。法定代表人:郑大亨,总经理。委托代理人:邱小飞、赵瑜,广东大公威德律师事务所律师。第三人:珠海市中粤新通讯技术有限公司清算小组。地址:珠海市香洲。负责人:郑大亨。委托代理人:邱小飞、赵瑜,广东大公威德律师事务所律师。原告新西兰THEATRELIGHTLTD因诉被告珠海市对外贸易经济合作局行政审批一案,向本院提起诉讼。本院依法组成合议庭于2003年9月3日公开开庭审理了本案,原告委托代理人张洁和被告委托代理人常征、温晓敏、第三人委托代理人邱小飞、赵瑜到庭参加诉讼。本案现已审理终结。珠海市对外贸易经济合作局2002年2月28日作出珠外经贸资[2002]17号《关于合作企业珠海泰立调光设备有限公司补充合同之二及章程修改之二的批复》(以下简称17号文),同意该司吸收新股东珠海泰立灯光音响设计安装有限公司,并同意对投资总额的增加及各股东占注册资本比例的调整。原告新西兰THEATRELIGHTLTD不服该文提起诉讼,请求:l、判令被告立即撤销文号为珠外经贸资[2002]17号《关于合作企业珠海泰立调光设备有限公司补充合同之二及章程修改之二的批复》。2、判令被告承担本案诉讼费用。事实与理由:1994年7月28日,原告与珠海市中粤新通讯技术有限公司(以下简称中粤新公司)合作成立珠海泰立调光设备有限公司(以下简称泰立调光公司)。泰立调光公司的投资总额为200万元人民币,双方投资额各为人民币100万元。原告与中粤新公司的利润分成比例分别为:60%、40%。2002年1月,中粤新公司与珠海泰立灯光音响设计安装有限公司(以下简称泰立灯光公司)假冒泰立调光公司法定代表人REXGILFILLAN先生签名、擅自私刻原告公章,向被告提交了虚假的《协议书》、《补充合同二》、《章程修改之二》。被告基于上述虚假文件作出了17号批复。基于此批复,泰立调光公司新增了泰立灯光公司为股东,注册资本由原来的200万元人民币增至350万元,原告、中粤新公司、泰立灯光公司三方的利润分配变为40%、30%、30%。原告在泰立调光公司所占的股份下降了20%。此外,需要特别说明的是非法新增加的股东泰立灯光公司的法定代表人也是郑大亨,其股东则是郑大亨与其子郑新宇。2002年10月,原告发现了上述情况后,于12月20日向被告正式提出了书面函件,要求撤销关于合作企业珠海泰立调光设备有限公司补充合同之二及章程修改之二的批复的《申请》。被告于2002年11月28日召开了听证会。会上,中粤新公司法定代表人郑大亨也承认上述协议书,补充合同和章程修改中的REXILFILLAN先生签名和原告公司的公章都并非是真实的签名和公章。同时,中粤新公司还辩解说是基于原告的授权才代签名并另刻一公章,以便备用。但中粤新公司至今未能提出任何证据来支持其所谓授权的说法。原告认为:中粤新公司与泰立灯光公司恶意串通,使原告在泰立调光公司的股份降低,直接损害了原告的利益。原告在过去的半年中曾多次向被告致函,致电要求被告尽快作出相应的行政决定,但被告在明知当初泰立调光公司提交的资料有虚假的情况下,至今没有撤销上述批复,且没有给予原告一个合理的解释。根据《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》第十一条第五款、第五十四条第三款的规定,原告现向贵院提起诉讼。请求贵院查明事实后,依法支持原告的诉讼请求,判令被告立即撤销当时所批复的文件,维护原告的合法权益。

New Zealand THEATRELIGHTLTD and administration of bureau of collaboration of Zhuhai city foreign trade economy are examined and approve case

Guangdong omits report of administration of court of Zhuhai city intermediate people

(2003) bead the word at the beginning of Sino-French travel the 7th

Accuser: ? HEATRELIGHTLTD of contraction bone Ji . Address: 6ROWESTREET, p.O.BOX13-159ONEHUNGAAUCKLANDNEWZELAND. Legal representative: REXGILFILLAND, president. Attorney: ?  of  of  of barefooteding approach of soak yo ⒘ is stupefied  fights Α of moisture in the soil of  of Ge of contraction of κ of maltose moisture in the soil bureau of collaboration of foreign trade economy of city of Zhuhai of 1 post? . Address: ? Date of?9 of  of Xi of heir of  of big-eared of quiet of Xing of J of principle columns of a hall. Legal representative: ? Exemplary swim  of N of ぁ of   breed writes Chang Zheng of? of  the sliding weight of a steelyard, Wen Xiaomin, all be this bureau official. : of the 3rd person?  of Xing of dam of dark blue of gourd ladle of bail of warm up of Li of cook of ping of ⒌ of ┝ of L of principle columns of a hall aing kind of sweet grass uses up Zheng Daheng of? of the sliding weight of a steelyard of  of 7 ǘ ù , general manager. Attorney: ? Jian "  of ぃ of umbrella ⒄ bath is stupefied limited company of technology of new news report of the another name for Guangdong Province in city of Zhuhai of? of  of 5 a surname liquidates Α of moisture in the soil of  of Ge of contraction of κ of Lv Shang of  of  Lian  group. Address: ? Qu of quiet of Xing of J of principle columns of a hall Zheng Daheng of? of quail of 8 dry up. Attorney: ? Jian "  of ぃ of umbrella ⒄ bath is stupefied because HEATRELIGHTLTD of Ji of bone of contraction of Lei of  of T of Α of moisture in the soil of  of Ge of contraction of κ of Lv Shang of  of  Lian  accuses administration of bureau of collaboration of foreign trade economy of city of the accused Zhuhai examines and approve one case, to this academy to lodge a complaint. This academy comprised collegiate bench to hear this case at making public open a court session on September 3, 2003 lawfully, qiu of attorney of plaintiff attorney Zhang Jie and Chang Zheng of the accused attorney, Wen Xiaomin, the 3rd person is small fly, Zhao Yu joins suit to front courtyard. This case already was tried now terminative. Bureau of collaboration of Zhuhai city foreign trade economy was made on Feburary 28, 2002 bead outside classics trade endowment [2002]17 date " the reaching that establishs contract of complement of limited company of the equipment that move light about peaceful of cooperative enterprise Zhuhai constitution revises give an official " (the following abbreviation 17 article) , agree with this department to absorb peaceful of new partner Zhuhai to establish lighting acoustics to design installation limited company, the addition that agrees with pair of investment amount and each partner are occupied register capital proportional adjust. THEATRELIGHTLTD of accuser New Zealand refuses to obey this article to lodge a complaint, request: L, sentence your defendant instantly cancel article date is bead outside classics trade endowment [2002]17 date " the reaching that establishs contract of complement of limited company of the equipment that move light about peaceful of cooperative enterprise Zhuhai constitution revises give an official " . 2, sentence your the accused to bear this case lawsuit cost. Fact and reason: 1994 years on July 28, limited company of technology of new news report of the another name for Guangdong Province in accuser and Zhuhai city (new company of the another name for Guangdong Province in the following abbreviation) collaboration moves optical equipment limited company into Lizhuhaitaili (peaceful of the following abbreviation establishs) of the company that move light. Peaceful establishs the investment amount of the company that move light to be 2 million yuan of RMBs, bilateral investment is a RMB each 1 million yuan. Accuser and in the profit cent of new company of another name for Guangdong Province is respectively into scale: 60 % , 40 % . In January 2002, in new company of another name for Guangdong Province and Zhuhai peaceful establish lighting acoustics to design installation limited company (peaceful of the following abbreviation establishs light company) sham peaceful establishs illicit of autograph of legal representative of the company that move light Mr REXGILFILLAN, do sth without authorization to engrave accuser official seal, referred to the accused false " agreement " , " compensatory contract 2 " , " constitution revises " . The accused was based on afore-mentioned fake documents to make 17 written reply to a subordinate body. Be based on this give an official, peaceful established the company that move light to add peaceful newly to establish light company to be partner, register capital to be added by 2 million yuan of original RMBs reach 3.5 million yuan, accuser, medium the profit that new company of another name for Guangdong Province, peaceful establishs light company tripartite allocates turn into 40% , 30% , 30% . The stock that accuser establishs place of the company that move light to occupy in peaceful fell 20 % . In addition, the dispute law that needs special specification is new the legal representative that increasing partner peaceful establishs light company also is Zheng Daheng, its partner is Zheng Daheng and its child Zheng Xinyu. In October 2002, after accuser discovered afore-mentioned circumstances, will put forward written correspondence formally to the accused on December 20, the reaching that requirement cancel establishs contract of complement of limited company of the equipment that move light about peaceful of cooperative enterprise Zhuhai constitution revises of give an official " application " . The accused held a hearing on November 28, 2002. On the meeting, new fair administration of justice decides another name for Guangdong Province to also admit afore-mentioned agreement on behalf of person Zheng Daheng in, compensatory contract and constitution revise the official seal of medium Mr REXILFILLAN autograph and prosecutor firm to be not is real sign one's name and official seal. In the meantime, the accredit that new company of another name for Guangdong Province still explains saying is to be based on accuser in just takes the place of to sign and engrave one official seal additionally, so that reserve. But in new company of another name for Guangdong Province fails to put forward any evidence to support its up to now the view of alleged accredit. Does accuser think: ? Does archives of evil spirit beanstalk stop grave of lens of  of Bei of ⒌ of ┝ of straightforward advice of Bi of good  of  of ǎ of  of Xun of a surname of diameter of  of ping of ⒌ of ┝ of carbylamine of house of  of sexual row deer holding sb in respectful awe holding sb in respectful awe sex of dim glow of the setting sun of peptide of road of サ of  of Quan of Bi of  of T of Jin of  of adept harmonious of  of cough of ferociousing α of  benzene uranium?

本文来自投稿,不代表君士君法律咨询网立场,如若转载,请注明出处:http://www.junshijun.com/wts/26530.html