1. 首页
  2. 法律委托案例
  3. 上海某市北销售有限公司诉宋某等供用气合同纠纷案

上海某市北销售有限公司诉宋某等供用气合同纠纷案

上海某市北销售有限公司诉宋某等供用气合同纠纷案上海市普陀区人民法院民事判决书(2012)普民一(民)初字第3544号原告上海某市北销售有限公司。法定代表人汪某。委托代理人周某。...

上海某市北销售有限公司诉宋某等供用气合同纠纷案

上海市普陀区人民法院

民事判决书

(2012)普民一(民)初字第3544号

原告上海某市北销售有限公司。

法定代表人汪某。

委托代理人周某。

委托代理人张某。

被告宋某。

被告徐某。

原告上海某市北销售有限公司(以下简称某公司)与被告宋某、徐某供用气合同纠纷一案, 本院受理后, 依法由代理审判员陈献民独任审判,公开开庭进行了审理。原告某公司的委托代理人周某、张某到庭参加诉讼,被告宋某、徐某经本院合法传唤,无正当理由未到庭。本案现已审理终结。

原告某公司诉称, 被告2004年3月、2008年6月使用某后,累计未支付某使用费人民币511.80元,原告经多次催讨未果,故起诉要求被告支付拖欠的某使用费人民511.80元及逾期付款滞纳金人民币511.80元,诉讼费由被告承担。

被告宋某未作答辩。

被告徐某未作答辩。

经审理查明,被告宋某、徐某作为原告用户,被告2004年3月、2008年6月使用某后,累计拖欠原告某使用费计人民币511.80元、逾期付款滞纳金人民币511.80元。原告经催讨未果,于2012年5月起诉来院,请求判决如其诉请。

上述事实,有原告提供的被告户籍资料、某消费量记录卡、某帐款催收单、交寄挂号邮件清单等在案佐证。原告并表示对上述证据的真实性、合法性愿意承担法律责任。被告宋某、徐某未到庭质证。

本院认为,公民、法人的合法权益受法律保护。被告使用原告提供的某后,双方即确立了某使用及服务合同关系,被告应当按时支付某使用费,逾期不支付的,某销售企业可以按日加收应支付款额千分之一的滞纳金。但被告在使用某期间却拖欠某使用费,其行为侵犯了原告的合法权益,现原告要求被告支付某使用费和滞纳金的请求,有原告的陈述及原告出具的欠费清单等证据予以佐证,于法有据,本院予以支持。被告宋某、徐某经本院合法传唤无正当理由拒不到庭,视为放弃抗辩、质证等权利,不影响对本案公正审理,由此可能产生的不利后果由被告自行承担。据此,依照《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》第一百三十条、《中华人民共和国合同法》第一百七十六条、第一百八十二条、第一百八十四条之规定,判决如下:

一、被告宋某、徐某应于本判决生效之日起十日内给付原告上海某市北销售有限公司某使用欠费计人民币511.80元;

二、被告宋某、徐某应于本判决生效之日起十日内给付原告上海某市北销售有限公司某使用欠费滞纳金人民币511.80元。

如未按本判决指定的期间履行给付金钱义务的,应当依照《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》第二百二十九条之规定,加倍支付迟延履行期间的债务利息。

本案受理费人民币50元,减半收取,计人民币25元,由被告宋某、徐某负担。

如不服本判决,可在判决书送达之日起十五日内向本院递交上诉状,并按对方当事人的人数提出副本,上诉于上海市第二中级人民法院。

代理审判员 陈献民

二〇一二年六月二十日

书记员 翁宣磊

North of Shanghai some city sells limited company to appeal to Song Mou to wait to enrage contract dispute desk for using

Court of people of division of Shanghai general Tuo

Civil judgment

(2012) general civilian one (civilian) first word the 3544th

North of accuser Shanghai some city sells limited company.

Legal representative Wang Mou.

Attorney Zhou Mou.

Attorney Zhang Mou.

The accused Song Mou.

The accused Xu Mou.

North of accuser Shanghai some city sells limited company (the following abbreviation some company) with the accused Song Mou, Xu Mou enrages contract dispute for using one case, after this academy is accepted, hold the post of adjudgement alone by acting judge Chen Xianmin lawfully, open open a court session undertook cognizance. The attorney Zhou Mou of some company, Zhang Mou goes to accuser front courtyard joins suit, lawful subpoena of this academy of classics of the accused Song Mou, Xu Mou, did not arrive without warrant front courtyard. This case already was tried now terminative.

Some company tells prosecutor say, the accused in March 2004, after using some in June 2008, accumulative total did not pay RMB of some use cost 511.8 yuan, accuser classics for many times dun not if really, reason sues requirement the accused to pay some use cost that default people 511.8 yuan reach exceed the time limit to pay RMB of fine for delaying payment 511.8 yuan, legal cost is assumed by the accused.

Some did not make the accused a surname rejoin.

Some did not make the accused Xu rejoin.

Find out via cognizance, the accused Song Mou, Xu Mou regards accuser as the user, the accused in March 2004, after using some in June 2008, accumulative total defaults accuser some uses cost plan RMB 511.8 yuan, exceed the time limit pays RMB of fine for delaying payment 511.8 yuan. Accuser classics dun not if really, come at was being sued in May 2012 courtyard, the request adjudicates if appeal.

Afore-mentioned facts, card of record of the data of the accused census register that accuser is offerred, some consumption, some funds on account is urged receive sheet, hand in send registration mailing detailed list to wait for on record evidence. Accuser states the authenticity of afore-mentioned pair of evidence, lawful sex is willing to assume legal responsibility. The accused Song Mou, Xu Mou did not pledge to front courtyard card.

This academy thinks, citizen, corporative adds up to right beneficial to suffer law to protect. The accused use accuser offers after some, bilateral namely establish some is used reach service contract concern, the accused ought to pay some use fee on time, exceed the time limit does not pay, some sale business can be added by day close should geld forehead the fine for delaying payment of one thousandth. But the accused defaults some use cost however during using some, its behavior encroached the legitimate rights and interests of accuser, show accuser to ask the accused pays the request of some use cost and fine for delaying payment, the evidence such as the detailed account owing cost that the allegation of accuser and accuser are issued gives evidence, have at the law according to, this academy gives support. The accused Song Mou, Xu Mou does not have warrant refus to be less than front courtyard via this academy lawful subpoena, regard as abandon the right such as contradictory, qualitative card, do not affect just to this case cognizance, the adverse consequence that produces possibly from this is assumed by the accused proper motion. Accordingly, according to " code of civil law of People's Republic of China " the 130th, " contract law of People's Republic of China " the 176th, the 182nd, the 184th regulation, the court decision is as follows:

One, the accused Song Mou, Xu Mou should rise at adjudicating the day of become effective originally 10 accuse north of Shanghai some city to sell limited company to Fu Yuan in a few days some is used owe cost plan RMB 511.8 yuan of;

2, the accused Song Mou, Xu Mou should rise at adjudicating the day of become effective originally 10 accuse north of Shanghai some city to sell limited company to Fu Yuan in a few days some uses RMB of the fine for delaying payment that owe cost 511.8 yuan.

Those who pay money obligation is fulfill during be like what did not appoint by this court decision, ought to according to " code of civil law of People's Republic of China " the 229th regulation, pay doubly to walk on the debt interest between date of departure tardily.

This case accepts cost RMB 50 yuan, halve collection, plan RMB 25 yuan, by burden of the accused Song Mou, Xu Mou.

If refuse to obey,adjudicate originally, can be since the day of judgment service 15 days of indrawn this academy hand over petition for appeal, the number that presses a the opposing party offers copy, appeal at Shanghai court of the 2nd intermediate people.

Acting judge Chen Xianmin

Two years on June 20

Lei of clerk father a surname

本文来自投稿,不代表君士君法律咨询网立场,如若转载,请注明出处:http://www.junshijun.com/wts/2.html