1. 首页
  2. 法律委托案例
  3. 民事判决书 (2012)浦民一(民)初字第15682号

民事判决书 (2012)浦民一(民)初字第15682号

上海市浦东新区人民法院民事判决书(2012)浦民一(民)初字第15682号原告xx,女,xx号。委托代理人xx,上海翰浩律师事务所律师。被告xx,住所地上海市xx号。法定代表人xx,董事长。委托代理人xx,男,xx工作。委托代理人xx,男,xx工作。被告xx,住所地上海市xx号。法定代表人xx,总经理。委托代理人xx,上海市海华永泰律师事务所律师。被告xx,男,1958年8月10日生,汉族,住上海市浦东新区xx号。被告xx,住所地上海市xx号...

上海市浦东新区人民法院

民事判决书

(2012)浦民一(民)初字第15682号

原告xx,女,xx号。

委托代理人xx,上海翰浩律师事务所律师。

被告xx,住所地上海市xx号。

法定代表人xx,董事长。

委托代理人xx,男,xx工作。

委托代理人xx,男,xx工作。

被告xx,住所地上海市xx号。

法定代表人xx,总经理。

委托代理人xx,上海市海华永泰律师事务所律师。

被告xx,男,1958年8月10日生,汉族,住上海市浦东新区xx号。

被告xx,住所地上海市xx号。

负责人xx,总经理。

委托代理人xx,中豪律师集团(上海)事务所律师。

委托代理人xx,中豪律师集团(上海)事务所律师。

原告xx诉被告xx(以下简称xx公司)、xx(以下简称xx保险公司)、xx、xx(以下简称人民保险公司)及xx机动车交通事故责任纠纷一案,本院于2012年5月18日立案受理后,依法适用简易程序,由代理审判员韩伶独任审判,于2012年6月12日公开开庭进行了审理。审理中,原告以xx系履行职务行为为由撤回了对xx的起诉。原告xx的委托代理人xx、被告xx公司的委托代理人xx、被告xx保险公司的委托代理人xx、被告xx、被告人民保险公司的委托代理人xx到庭参加诉讼。本案现已审理终结。

原告xx诉称,2011年9月1日18时15分许,被告xx公司员工xx驾驶牌号为沪xx轻型专项作业车,沿本市浦东新区花山路由东向西行驶至花山路高桥镇小学西,因被告xx驾驶其所有牌号为豫xx轿车违法停车,致使原告驾驶电动自行车驶入机动车道后不慎被xx撞倒在地,造成原告受伤的交通事故。经交警部门认定xx承担本起事故主要责任、被告xx承担次要责任、原告无责。当日,原告被送往上海市第七人民医院住院治疗。原告因此次事故共遭受如下损失:医疗费人民币(以下币种同)21,389.44元、住院伙食补助费940元(20元/天47天)、营养费3,600元(40元/天90天)、残疾赔偿金72,460元(36,230元/年20年0.1)、护理费3,434.50元(市场护工工资标准20,893元/年/365天60天)、交通费940元、误工费10,476元(事发前原告月工资标准2,019元4个月)、精神损害抚慰金5,000元、车损费100元、衣物损失费900元、鉴定费1,800元、律师费6,000元,因沪xx车辆在被告xx保险公司投保交强险,豫PP78H车辆在被告人民保险公司投保交强险,故原告起诉要求以上损失由被告xx保险公司、被告人民保险公司在交强险范围内各半承担赔偿责任,精神损害抚慰金要求在交强险限额内优先赔付,超出或者不属于交强险范围的部分由被告xx公司、被告xx承担连带赔偿责任。

被告xx公司辩称,xx系被告员工,事故当时系履行职务行为。被告对事发经过、责任认定均无异议,愿意对原告超过交强险责任限额部分损失承担百分之七十的赔偿责任。事发后,被告为原告垫付住院押金15,000元及医疗费1,256.95元,要求在本案中一并处理。赔偿项目以保险公司意见为准。律师费金额过高,被告认可3,000元。

被告xx保险公司辩称,沪xx车辆在被告处投保了交强险,事发时在保险期间内。被告愿意在交强险责任限额内与被告人民保险公司各半承担赔付责任。医疗费用中应扣除没有病史记载的医疗费用、没有处方佐证外购药费用及住院期间伙食费。住院天数46.5天。护理费按40元/天计算。营养费按30元/天计算。车辆损失费和衣物损失费酌情共认可200元。原告误工证明不足,被告认可按本市最低工资标准计算误工费。原告签订的劳动合同上记载的居住地址和居住证明上的居住地址不符,被告认为劳动合同上记载的居住地址更符合事实,原告应按农村居民标准计算残疾赔偿金。交通费认可300元。精神损害抚慰金认可5,000元,由两家保险公司在交强险限额内各半负担。

被告xx辩称,被告没有违法停车,对事故责任认定有异议。赔偿项目以保险公司意见为准。

被告人民保险公司辩称,豫xx车辆在被告处投保了交强险,事发时在保险期间内。被告愿意在交强险责任限额内承担赔付责任。除同意被告xx保险公司提出的意见外,被告对原告伤残等级提出异议,认为原告伤情不构成十级伤残,申请对原告伤残等级重新鉴定。若构成伤残,被告认可精神损害抚慰金5,000元,由两家保险公司按照责任比例在交强险限额内承担。

经审理查明,2011年9月1日18时15分许,被告xx公司员工xx驾驶公司所有的牌号为沪xx轻型专项作业车,沿本市浦东新区花山路由东向西行驶至花山路高桥镇小学西,因被告xx驾驶其所有牌号为豫xx轿车违法停车,致使原告xx驾驶电动自行车驶入机动车道后不慎被沪xx车辆撞倒在地,造成原告受伤的交通事故。经上海市公安局浦东分局高桥派出所认定xx承担本起事故主要责任、被告xx承担次要责任、原告无责。当日,原告被送往上海市第七人民医院治疗。2011年9月3日至2011年10月19日原告在上海市第七人民医院住院治疗,共计住院46.5天,诊断为左前臂挤压伤,左肘部皮肤坏死。出院后,原告数次至上海市第七人民医院、第二军医大学附属长海医院复诊。原告为治疗伤情共支付医疗费用21,468.74元(其中含住院期间伙食费708.80元),其中原告自付5,211.79元,被告xx公司垫付16,256.95元。2012年3月15日,经华东政法大学司法鉴定中心鉴定,原告因交通事故致左前臂挤压伤,左上肢车祸外伤后皮肤坏死,现左上臂瘢痕形成,左肘关节活动受限,评定十级伤残;酌情给予伤后休息4个月、营养3个月,护理2个月。原告为此支付了鉴定费1,800元。原告为修理电动自行车支付修理费100元。因原、被告未能就相关赔偿事项达成一致,原告于2012年5月提起本案诉讼,并聘请律师支付律师代理费6,000元。

另查明,被告xx公司为沪xx车辆在被告xx保险公司购买了机动车交通事故责任强制险,被告xx为豫xx轿车在被告人民保险公司购买了机动车交通事故责任强制险,事发时均在保险期间内。

又查明,原告户籍地位于山东省平邑县临涧镇坡里村143号。根据来沪人员居住登记表,原告于2007年4月来沪,居住本市浦东新区高桥镇浦东北路4588弄31号301室。2010年4月、2012年5月原告在沪居住地址均登记为本市浦东新区高桥镇陆凌村宋家宅24号201室。原告因本起事故在上海市第七人民医院住院治疗,其在住院病案首页上记载的家庭住址为本市浦东新区高桥镇陆凌村宋家宅24号。事发前原告在上海吉元德食品有限公司工作,月平均收入为2,619元。

Court of people of Shanghai Pudong new developed area

Civil judgment

(2012) Pu Min one (civilian) first word the 15682nd

Accuser Xx, female, xx date.

Attorney Xx, solicitor of office of attorney of Shanghai writing grand.

The accused Xx, abode ground Shanghai Xx date.

Legal representative Xx, president.

Attorney Xx, male, xx works.

Attorney Xx, male, xx works.

The accused Xx, abode ground Shanghai Xx date.

Legal representative Xx, general manager.

Attorney Xx, solicitor of office of Shanghai sea Hua Yongtai's attorney.

The accused Xx, male, unripe on August 10, 1958, the Han nationality, stay in Shanghai date of Xx of Pudong new developed area.

The accused Xx, abode ground Shanghai Xx date.

Chief Xx, general manager.

Attorney Xx, in group of lawyer of a person of extraordinary powers (Shanghai) office solicitor.

Attorney Xx, in group of lawyer of a person of extraordinary powers (Shanghai) office solicitor.

Accuser Xx tells company of Xx of the following abbreviation of the accused Xx() , Xx of Xx(the following abbreviation insurance company) , insurance company of people of the following abbreviation of Xx, Xx() issue of liability of accident of traffic of the motor vehicle that reach Xx one case, this academy after put on record was accepted on May 18, 2012, lawfully applicable and simple and easy program, by acting judge Han Ling holds the post of adjudgement alone, undertook cognizance at making public open a court session on June 12, 2012. In cognizance, accuser fulfills what pair of Xx recalled for functionary action to sue with Xx department. The attorney Xx of insurance company of people of the attorney Xx of insurance company, the accused Xx, the accused goes to the attorney Xx of company of the attorney Xx of accuser Xx, the accused Xx, the accused Xx front courtyard joins suit. This case already was tried now terminative.

Accuser Xx appeals to say, on September 1, 2011 18 when make 15 minutes, xx of staff of company of the accused Xx drives the brand is Shanghai Xx car of light-duty and special operation, along this city Pudong new developed area spends hill road to be sailed by Dong Xiangxi travel to beautiful hill Lu Gaoqiao presses down elementary school on the west, because the accused Xx drives its are all the brand jockeys to pleased Xx car breaks the law, cause accuser to drive after dynamoelectric bicycle sails motor vehicle, be in by Xx run down carelessly the ground, cause the traffic accident that accuser gets hurt. Via policeman branch cognizance Xx assumes this starting armed struggle Xx of main responsibility, the accused assumes reason less important responsibility, accuser is not had duty. That day, accuser is sent toward Shanghai hospitalization of hospital of the 7th people. Accuser suffers following losses in all because of this accident: Medical treatment expends a RMB (the following money is planted with) 21, 389.44 yuan, allowance of food of be in hospital expends 940 yuan (20 yuan / ) , nutrition is expended 3, 600 yuan (40 yuan / ) , disability compensation 72, 460 yuan (36, 230 yuan / every 0.1) , nurse cost 3, 434.5 yuan (the market protects worker pay standard 20, 893 yuan / year / ) , traffic expends 940 yuan, delay one's work is expended 10, 476 yuan (standard of monthly wages of the accuser before the accident 2, 019 yuan 4 months) , spirit damages solatium 5, 000 yuan, car caustic expends 100 yuan, clothings loss expends 900 yuan, appraisal is expended 1, 800 yuan, retaining fee 6, 000 yuan, in the accused Xx because of Shanghai Xx car insurance company is cast protect make strong narrow pass, comfort PP78H car is cast in insurance company of the accused people protect make strong narrow pass, reason accuser sues requirement above loss by the accused Xx insurance company of insurance company, the accused people is handing in the half and half inside strong danger limits to assume liability to pay compensation, spirit damages solatium to ask to making strong narrow pass preferential compensate pays inside limitation, exceed or do not belong to the part that makes strong danger range to assume implicative liability to pay compensation by Xx of company of the accused Xx, the accused.

Argue of company of the accused Xx says, xx ties the accused staff, the department fulfills the accident at that time functionary action. The accused is maintained to accident course, responsibility all consentient, be willing to hand in loss of share of limit of strong danger liability to assume the liability to pay compensation of 70% more than to accuser. After the accident, the accused is cash pledge of be in hospital of accuser pay for sb and expect to be repaid later 15, 000 yuan reach medical treatment to expend 1, 256.95 yuan, the requirement is handled along with all the others in this case. Compensatory project is with insurance company opinion accurate. Retaining fee amount is exorbitant, the accused is approbated 3, 000 yuan.

Insurance company argue of the accused Xx says, shanghai Xx car is cast in the accused place protected make strong narrow pass, it is when the accident between insurance period inside. The accused is willing to meeting strong danger duty compensate is assumed to pay duty with half and half of insurance company of the accused people inside limitation. The medical treatment expense that does not have medical history account should be deducted in medical treatment charge, during medical cost and be in hospital are being bought outside doing not have prescription evidence board expense. Day of be in hospital counts 46.5 days. Nurse cost presses 40 yuan / day computation. Nutrient cost presses 30 yuan / day computation. Car loss expenses and take into consideration the circumstances of clothings loss expenses approbate 200 yuan in all. Accuser delay one's work proves to be not worth, the accused is approbated by this city delay one's work of computation of minimum wage standard is expended. The living address of the account on the labor contract that accuser signs and the location of house dwelling place on living proof not agree with, the living address that the accused thinks labor closes Alexandrine account more accord with a fact, accuser should press compensation of disability of computation of rural dweller standard. Traffic expenses approbates 300 yuan. Spirit damages solatium to approbate 5, 000 yuan, meeting responsibility of the half and half inside strong danger limitation by two insurance company.

Argue of the accused Xx says, the accused did not break the law jockey, maintain to accident responsibility disagree. Compensatory project is with insurance company opinion accurate.

Argue of insurance company of the accused people says, comfort Xx car is cast in the accused place protected make strong narrow pass, it is when the accident between insurance period inside. The accused is willing to meeting strong danger duty compensate is assumed to pay duty inside limitation. Divide outside agreeing with the opinion that insurance company offers the accused Xx, the accused disables to accuser grade demur, think accuser hurts affection not to form 10 class to disable, application disables to accuser grade is new appraisal. If form,disable, the accused approbates spirit to damage solatium 5, 000 yuan, making strong narrow pass according to responsibility scale by two insurance company assume inside limitation.

Find out via cognizance, on September 1, 2011 18 when make 15 minutes, xx of staff of company of the accused Xx drives all company names are Shanghai Xx car of light-duty and special operation, along this city Pudong new developed area spends hill road to be sailed by Dong Xiangxi travel to beautiful hill Lu Gaoqiao presses down elementary school on the west, because the accused Xx drives its are all the brand jockeys to pleased Xx car breaks the law, cause accuser Xx to drive after dynamoelectric bicycle sails motor vehicle be in by run down of Shanghai Xx car carelessly the ground, cause the traffic accident that accuser gets hurt. Via substation of Pudong of Shanghai public security bureau cognizance Xx assumes tall bridge police station to have an accident originally Xx of main responsibility, the accused assumes less important responsibility, accuser to not have duty. That day, accuser is sent toward Shanghai cure of hospital of the 7th people. Came on September 3, 2011 accuser was in Shanghai on October 19, 2011 hospitalization of hospital of the 7th people, add up to be in hospital 46.5 days, diagnose for left antebrachium crush injuries, left elbow skin is necrotic. After leaving hospital, accuser reachs Shanghai several times hospital of the 7th people, the 2nd Military Medical University grows sea hospital further consultation with a doctor accessorily. Accuser pays medical treatment fee in all to treat condition 21, 468.74 yuan (during containing be in hospital among them board expense 708.8 yuan of) , among them accuser pays oneself 5, 211.79 yuan, pay for sb and expect to be repaid later of company of the accused Xx 16, 256.95 yuan. On March 15, 2012, via appraisal of center of appraisal of judicatory of university of Hua Dongzheng law, accuser sends left antebrachium crush injuries because of traffic accident, the skin after traffic accident of left upper limbs is traumatic is necrotic, show cicatrization of left the upper arm, activity of left ancon joint suffers be restricted, assess 10 class disable after; take into consideration the circumstances gives, rest 4 months, nutrition 3 months, nurse 2 months. Accuser paid appraisal fee for this 1, 800 yuan. Accuser repairs cost to repair dynamoelectric bicycle to pay 100 yuan. Because former, the accused fails to be reached with respect to relevant compensation item,agree, accuser mentioned in May 2012 this case lawsuit, invite a lawyer to pay a lawyer acting fee 6, 000 yuan.

Additional find out, company of the accused Xx is Shanghai Xx car in the accused Xx insurance company bought responsibility of accident of motor vehicle traffic compulsive danger, the accused Xx bought responsibility of accident of motor vehicle traffic in insurance company of the accused people for comfort Xx car compulsive danger, all be when the accident between insurance period inside.

Find out again, position of accuser census register saves smooth city county to face gully to press down the village in slope at Shandong 143. According to coming to Shanghai personnel lives registration form, accuser came to Shanghai in April 2007, live road of north of Pudong of town of tall bridge of new developed area of this city Pudong 4588 lane 31 301 rooms. April 2010, accuser all was registered in Shanghai living address in May 2012 for this city Gao Qiao of Pudong new developed area presses down Song Jiazhai of Liu Ling village 24 201 rooms. Because accuser removes an accident to be in Shanghai originally hospitalization of hospital of the 7th people, its are this city in the home address of the account on home page of ill case of be in hospital messuage of the Song Dynasty of village of approach of land of town of tall bridge of Pudong new developed area 24. The accuser before the accident works in limited company of Shanghai Ji Yuande food, mean monthly income is 2, 619 yuan.

本文来自投稿,不代表君士君法律咨询网立场,如若转载,请注明出处:http://www.junshijun.com/wts/11.html